Published 2025-12-31 | Version v1.0
Policy BriefOpenPublished

From Predictive Control to Robustness

Why Indeterminacy Outperforms Precision in Contested ISR Environments

Description

This policy brief argues that contested ISR environments transform uncertainty from an information deficit into a structural condition created by exposure, interaction, and adversary adaptation. It challenges precision-centric drone warfare assessment and recommends shifting evaluation toward robustness, adversary learning speed, exposure accumulation, and governance mechanisms compatible with survivability.

Abstract

For much of the past decade, drone warfare has been evaluated through a precision-centric lens. Advances in sensing, data fusion, and command-and-control have reinforced the assumption that improved detection, tighter synchronization, and faster decision cycles translate into durable operational advantage. This policy brief argues that this assumption breaks down in contested ISR environments, where uncertainty is produced by interaction, exposure, and adversary adaptation. Precision-centric approaches may accelerate opponent learning, compress decision windows, and undermine long-run effectiveness. Robustness-oriented postures that preserve spatiotemporal indeterminacy can raise adversary costs and provide alternative pathways to stability when paired with process-based accountability, audit-by-design, and signal-management safeguards.

Files

PDF preview

Keywords

  • Predictive control
  • Robustness
  • Indeterminacy
  • Contested ISR
  • Drone warfare
  • Unmanned systems
  • Adversary learning
  • Exposure accumulation
  • Measurement–exposure trade-off
  • Spatiotemporal indeterminacy
  • ISR environments
  • Precision-centric warfare
  • Force planning
  • Escalation management
  • Governance and verification
  • Audit-by-design
  • Signal management norms
  • AI-enabled warfare
  • Strategic stability
  • EPINOVA

Subjects

  • AI-enabled warfare
  • Drone warfare
  • ISR systems
  • Strategic studies
  • Defense policy
  • Unmanned systems
  • Military technology
  • Escalation management
  • AI governance
  • Security governance
  • Operational resilience
  • Robustness and uncertainty
  • Arms control and verification
  • Public policy

Recommended citation

Wu, S.-Y. (2025). From predictive control to robustness: Why indeterminacy outperforms precision in contested ISR environments (Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2025–PB–03). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18110856. DOI: To be assigned after Crossref membership approval.

APA citation

Wu, S.-Y. (2025). From predictive control to robustness: Why indeterminacy outperforms precision in contested ISR environments (Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2025–PB–03). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18110856. DOI: To be assigned after Crossref membership approval.

Alternate identifiers

SchemeIdentifierDescription
DOI10.5281/zenodo.18110856Zenodo/DataCite DOI stated in the PDF recommended citation
DOI10.5281/zenodo.18110855Earlier DOI from ORCID-derived metadata record retained for reconciliation
ORCID put-code201135159ORCID Public API record identifier from early metadata
EPINOVA policy brief numberEPINOVA–2025–PB–03Policy brief number printed in the PDF
File nameFrom predictive control to robustness Why indeterminacy outperforms precision in contested ISR environments.pdfSource PDF file name
Short titleFrom Predictive Control to RobustnessShort form of the policy brief title

Related works

RelationIdentifierTypeDescription
Related EPINOVA policy brief on counter-drone defense sustainability and mission-preservation metrics10.5281/zenodo.18037881
Related EPINOVA working paper on uncertainty, presence, POSG modeling, and strategic stability in unmanned systems10.5281/zenodo.18081107

References

No references listed.