Published 2026-05-11 | Version v1.0
Working PaperOpenPublished

From Control Substitution to Structural Dominance: Morphological Convergence and Infrastructure Power in Autonomous Systems

Morphological Convergence and Infrastructure Power in Autonomous Systems

Description

This working paper develops a structural theory of autonomous power. It argues that autonomous-system competition is moving beyond platform morphology toward orchestration architectures and infrastructure control, as engineering constraints cause drones, robotic vehicles, unmanned maritime platforms, and other autonomous systems to converge around stable morphological attractors.

Abstract

The rapid expansion of autonomous systems has intensified competition over drones, robotic vehicles, unmanned maritime platforms, and other machine agents. Yet platform-centered competition may represent only a transitional phase. As engineering constraints, operational requirements, and mission profiles converge, autonomous platforms are likely to cluster around a limited number of stable morphologies. This paper argues that such convergence creates a morphology trap: actors may continue optimizing visible platform bodies after strategic advantage has shifted toward orchestration architectures and infrastructure control. It proposes a transition from control substitution, in which machines replace human operators, to structural dominance, in which power derives from coordinating, sustaining, and scaling autonomous ecosystems. The paper advances three propositions: platform morphology will increasingly converge; competitive advantage will migrate toward orchestration systems such as swarm coordination, distributed task allocation, and real-time integration; and long-term dominance will depend on control over compute, semiconductors, energy, manufacturing, logistics, and communication networks. The future of autonomous power will therefore be determined less by the sophistication of individual machines than by the infrastructures that allow autonomous systems to operate at scale.

Files

PDF preview
PDF preview

Mobile browsers may not display embedded PDF previews reliably. Open the PDF directly for the best reading experience.

Open PDF Download PDF

Keywords

  • autonomous systems
  • morphological convergence
  • infrastructure power
  • structural dominance
  • distributed robotics
  • swarm coordination
  • system orchestration
  • morphology trap
  • control substitution
  • morphological attractors
  • autonomous platforms
  • unmanned systems
  • robotics
  • drones
  • unmanned aerial vehicles
  • unmanned ground vehicles
  • autonomous maritime systems
  • infrastructure-dependent ecosystems
  • compute infrastructure
  • semiconductors
  • energy systems
  • manufacturing capacity
  • communication networks
  • logistics
  • AI governance
  • strategic technology
  • EPINOVA

Subjects

  • Artificial intelligence
  • AI governance
  • Autonomous systems
  • Robotics
  • Strategic technology
  • Infrastructure studies
  • Systems engineering
  • Defense innovation
  • Technology policy
  • Strategic competition

Recommended citation

Wu, Shaoyuan. (2026). From Control Substitution to Structural Dominance: Morphological Convergence and Infrastructure Power in Autonomous Systems (EPINOVA Working Paper No. EPINOVA–WP–A–2026–03). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. DOI: To be assigned after Crossref membership approval.

APA citation

Wu, S. (2026). From control substitution to structural dominance: Morphological convergence and infrastructure power in autonomous systems (EPINOVA Working Paper No. EPINOVA-WP-A-2026-03). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. DOI: To be assigned after Crossref membership approval.

Alternate identifiers

SchemeIdentifierDescription
URLhttps://epinova.org/working-papersOfficial EPINOVA working papers page
EPINOVA working paper numberEPINOVA–WP–A–2026–03Working paper number printed in the PDF
File nameFrom Control Substitution to Structural Dominance Beyond Morphology in the Age of Autonomous Systems.pdfSource PDF file name
Analytical conceptStructural DominanceCore concept developed in the working paper
Analytical conceptMorphology TrapStrategic misallocation condition introduced in the working paper
Analytical conceptMorphological ConvergenceCore mechanism explaining convergence of autonomous-system platform bodies

Related works

RelationIdentifierTypeDescription
IsPartOfhttps://epinova.org/working-papersPublication seriesEPINOVA Working Paper Series
IsSupplementedByhttps://github.com/EPINOVALLC/EPINOVA-ResearchRepositorySupplementary repository and structural archive
ReferencesAllen & Chan, 2017, Artificial Intelligence and National SecurityReportReferenced for AI, national security, and infrastructure implications of autonomy
ReferencesBrambilla et al., 2013, Swarm Robotics: A Review from the Swarm Engineering PerspectiveJournal articleReferenced for swarm robotics and distributed coordination
ReferencesFarrell & Newman, 2019, Weaponized InterdependenceJournal articleReferenced for infrastructure and network-based structural power
ReferencesFloreano & Wood, 2015, Science, Technology and the Future of Small Autonomous DronesJournal articleReferenced for autonomous drone technology and platform constraints
ReferencesLosos, 2017, Improbable DestiniesBookReferenced for convergent evolution and morphological analogy

References

  1. Allen, G. C., & Chan, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence and national security. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/artificial-intelligence-and-national-security
  2. Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1382.html
  3. Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Network science. Cambridge University Press. https://networksciencebook.com
  4. Beni, G. (2005). From swarm intelligence to swarm robotics. In E. Şahin & W. M. Spears (Eds.), Swarm robotics (pp. 1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30552-1_1
  5. Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M. (2013). Swarm robotics: A review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intelligence, 7(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2
  6. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393254296
  7. Dorigo, M. (2020). Reflections on the future of swarm robotics. Science Robotics, 5(49), eabe4385. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abe4385
  8. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
  9. Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015). Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature, 521, 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14542
  10. Hamann, H. (2018). Swarm robotics: A formal approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74528-2
  11. Holland, J. H. (2014). Complexity: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199662547.001.0001
  12. Horowitz, M. C. (2010). The diffusion of military power: Causes and consequences for international politics. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691143964/the-diffusion-of-military-power
  13. Horowitz, M. C., Kahn, L., & Mahoney, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and international security. International Organization, 74(S1), E1–E16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000166
  14. Johnson, J. (2023). Automating the OODA loop in the age of intelligent machines: Reaffirming the role of humans in command-and-control decision-making in the digital age. Defense Studies, 23(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2102486
  15. Kott, A., & Alberts, D. S. (2017). How do you command an army of intelligent things? arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.08976
  16. Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., & Cianchetti, M. (2016). Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Science Robotics, 1(1), eaah3690. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aah3690
  17. Losos, J. B. (2017). Improbable destinies: Fate, chance, and the future of evolution. Riverhead Books. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/252877/improbable-destinies-by-jonathan-b-losos/
  18. McGhee, G. R. (2011). Convergent evolution: Limited forms most beautiful. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262016420/convergent-evolution/
  19. Murphy, R. R. (2014). Disaster robotics. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262525892/disaster-robotics/
  20. Scharre, P. (2018). Army of none: Autonomous weapons and the future of war. W. W. Norton. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393608990
  21. Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. Penguin Press. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/306515/wired-for-war-by-pw-singer/
  22. Watts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. W. W. Norton. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393325422